A rare, on-the-record profile of White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles in Vanity Fair has ignited a political firestorm. Known for her typical “ice-cold” discipline and preference for the shadows, Wiles’ blunt assessments of President Trump and his inner circle have left Washington questioning the stability of the administration’s second-term hierarchy.
Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!The “Alcoholic Personality” Comparison
The most striking headline from the profile involves Wiles comparing President Trump to an alcoholic.
- The Nuance: She was not referring to substance abuse—Trump is famously a teetotaler.
- The Definition: Drawing on her experience growing up with a father (Pat Summerall) who struggled with addiction, Wiles described Trump’s “all-or-nothing” drive, obsessive focus, and relentless risk-taking as an “alcoholic’s personality.”
- The President’s Stance: In a surprising turn, Trump did not take offense, telling reporters he agreed with the assessment of his “possessive and addictive” nature.
Critiquing the Inner Circle
Wiles did not hold back when discussing other heavy hitters in the administration:
- JD Vance: She labeled the Vice President a “conspiracy theorist,” suggesting his evolution into a MAGA loyalist was a strategic “political” move rather than a deeply held ideological shift.
- Pam Bondi: Wiles criticized the Attorney General for “poor judgment” regarding the release of the Epstein files, claiming Bondi failed to manage the situation effectively.
- Elon Musk: She reportedly expressed frustration with the billionaire’s “solo actor” tendencies and referred to him as an “odd duck.”
Internal Policy Rifts
The profile painted a picture of a Chief of Staff often at odds with the President’s more extreme impulses:
- Retribution: Wiles admitted to a “loose agreement” meant to curb Trump’s fixation on political vengeance after his first 90 days in office.
- Economic Strain: She acknowledged that the administration’s aggressive tariff policies have caused more economic “pain” than originally forecasted.
Damage Control and the “Hit Job” Defense
Following the backlash, Wiles moved quickly to contain the narrative. She issued a public statement denouncing the article as a “disingenuously framed hit job,” accusing the author of “cherry-picking” quotes from months of conversations to create a sense of internal division.
Why It Matters
While staff profiles are common, the level of transparency from a sitting Chief of Staff is unprecedented. The profile reveals a White House defined by:
- Internal Power Struggles: Clear friction between “traditional” strategists like Wiles and populist firebrands like Vance and Musk.
- The Loyalty Paradox: Despite the bluntness of her remarks, Wiles’ job appears secure, highlighting Trump’s unique preference for staffers who are willing to be “brutally honest” to his face—even if it spills into the press.

















