google-site-verification=sVM5bW4dz4pBUBx08fDi3frlhMoRYb75bthh-zE8SYY The Bryan Kohberger restitution hearing has concluded with the judge, Steven Hippler, withholding a final decision, which is expected to be issued in writing later. - TAX Assistant

The Bryan Kohberger restitution hearing has concluded with the judge, Steven Hippler, withholding a final decision, which is expected to be issued in writing later.

By Tax assistant

Published on:

The Bryan Kohberger restitution hearing has concluded with the judge, Steven Hippler, withholding a final decision, which is expected to be issued in writing later.

The hearing centered on a dispute over additional restitution payments to the families of the University of Idaho murder victims, Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin.

Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!

Developments in the Hearing

  • Prosecutorial Error & New Request: Latah County Prosecutor Bill Thompson conceded a major miscalculation, retracting his request for approximately $27,000 in travel expenses for the victims’ families, as they were not outlined in Kohberger’s plea deal. He instead asked the court to award about $3,075.58 to cover funeral expenses (like urns).
  • The Plea Deal as a Contract: Judge Hippler stressed that the plea deal is a contract, limiting the prosecution’s ability to seek payments (like the travel costs) outside its agreed-upon terms. Kohberger’s deal already includes over $250,000 in fines/fees and $20,000 in civil judgments to each victim’s family.
  • Defense’s Objections: Kohberger’s lawyers argued he should not have to pay the new, lower amount for funeral expenses because:
    • The victims’ families had already received extensive funds through GoFundMe campaigns.
    • Kohberger has no potential future income while serving consecutive life sentences.
  • The “Five-Figure” Donation: Judge Hippler challenged the defense’s claim of no future income, revealing that Kohberger had already received a “five-figure” donation into his jail funds.
  • Profiting from the Crime: The defense argued Idaho law prevents Kohberger from profiting from his story (book/movie). Judge Hippler clarified that Idaho’s “Son of Sam” law would indeed earmark any such profits to cover debts to the victims; however, if no debt existed for certain things, the money’s destination is a point of contention.

The judge’s written decision will ultimately determine the amount of additional restitution Kohberger is required to pay.

Would you like me to focus on a specific aspect of the hearing, such as the debate over the victims’ GoFundMe donations?