Chappaqua Under Siege: Neighbors React to Clinton’s Epstein Deposition

The quiet, leafy streets of Chappaqua, New York, were transformed into a high-security zone on February 26, 2026, as Hillary Clinton arrived at the local Performing Arts Center to deliver long-awaited testimony regarding the Jeffrey Epstein investigation.

Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!

While the proceedings happened behind closed doors, the atmosphere outside was anything but private.

A Hamlet Divided

For the residents of this affluent Westchester suburb, the arrival of global media and Secret Service barricades brought the Epstein scandal to their front doors. The reactions from neighbors highlighted a community caught between loyalty and lingering suspicion:

• The Weary Resident: Many locals expressed a desire for the circus to leave town. “It’s a quiet hamlet; we aren’t used to metal detectors at the arts center,” noted one neighbor, focusing more on the logistical headache than the politics.
• The Hardliners: The political vitriol was palpable. Some residents, like Jim Levine, didn’t mince words, telling reporters that the location was a “privilege” and calling for legal accountability.
• The Defenders: Others, like Bernie Hunt, viewed the deposition as a necessary but politically charged “fishing expedition,” acknowledging the right of Congress to investigate while questioning the timing.

Six Hours Under Oath: The Defensive Stand

Inside, Clinton faced a marathon six-hour deposition. According to leaked reports and official statements, her strategy was one of total detachment and counter-accusation:

1. The “Never Met Him” Defense: Clinton maintained a consistent line, stating under oath that she had zero personal contact with Epstein, never used his private jet, and never visited any of his properties.
2. The Counter-Strike: In a sharp pivot, she labeled the Republican-led inquiry a “calculated distraction,” challenging the committee to exert the same pressure on Donald Trump to testify about his verified social history with Epstein.
3. The Boebert Incident: The tension peaked when Rep. Lauren Boebert allegedly leaked a “sneaked” photo from the secure room, leading to a brief but chaotic suspension of the hearing as security protocols were reviewed.

Note on Digital Integrity: While the testimony was real, it’s important to stay vigilant against the surge of AI-generated “evidence” appearing on social media. Fabricated images of Clinton at Epstein’s Caribbean residence have been thoroughly debunked by forensic experts; they are sophisticated fakes designed to influence public opinion during this high-profile probe.